{"id":4652,"date":"2026-04-14T10:56:47","date_gmt":"2026-04-14T02:56:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsunn.com\/how-advanced-mpu-design-reduces-power-costs-in-remote-iot-devices\/"},"modified":"2026-04-14T10:56:47","modified_gmt":"2026-04-14T02:56:47","slug":"how-advanced-mpu-design-reduces-power-costs-in-remote-iot-devices","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsunn.com\/es\/how-advanced-mpu-design-reduces-power-costs-in-remote-iot-devices\/","title":{"rendered":"C\u00f3mo el dise\u00f1o avanzado de MPU reduce los costos de energ\u00eda en dispositivos IoT remotos"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n

C\u00f3mo el dise\u00f1o avanzado de MPU reduce los costos de energ\u00eda en dispositivos IoT remotos<\/h1>\n<\/header>\n

\"C\u00f3mo<\/p>\n

\n

Why Advanced MPU Design Matters for Remote IoT Power Costs<\/h2>\n

\"Why<\/p>\n

If you have ever managed a large-scale remote IoT deployment, you already know that the initial hardware cost is just the tip of the iceberg. I often talk with procurement teams who focus intensely on shaving pennies off the bill of materials (BOM), only to watch their operating expenses explode a year later. The culprit is almost always power consumption. When devices are deployed in hard-to-reach locations\u2014like agricultural fields, offshore rigs, or smart city infrastructure\u2014the power architecture of your Microprocessor Unit (MPU) dictates the financial viability of the entire project.<\/p>\n

An advanced MPU design fundamentally changes the economics of these deployments. Unlike older, power-hungry processors that run at full throttle regardless of the task, modern MPUs are designed with sophisticated power management capabilities. They can throttle down, shut off unused cores, and wake up in fractions of a second. This means the device draws minimal current from the battery while still providing the processing muscle needed for edge computing when an event occurs.<\/p>\n

Understanding this shift is crucial for B2B buyers. We are no longer just buying a silicon chip; we are buying a specific power profile. Choosing the right Energy-Efficient MPU<\/a> requires a deep dive into how that component\u2019s architecture will behave in the field, how it affects your battery selection, and ultimately, how it impacts your bottom line over a five- or ten-year lifecycle.<\/p>\n

How MPU power efficiency changes total operating cost<\/h3>\n

Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) in remote IoT is heavily weighted toward operational expenditures (OPEX). When an MPU is highly efficient, you can design the device with a smaller, less expensive battery, or alternatively, use a standard battery that lasts twice as long. This efficiency cascades through the entire operating budget, reducing the frequency of maintenance cycles, lowering the cost of replacement parts, and minimizing downtime for the end-user.<\/p>\n

Impact on battery replacement cycles and truck rolls<\/h3>\n

In the managed services and IoT infrastructure world, a \u201ctruck roll\u201d\u2014sending a technician to a remote site to replace a battery\u2014can cost anywhere from $150 to $500 per visit. If your deployment consists of 10,000 sensors, a poorly optimized MPU that drains batteries in two years instead of five will trigger millions of dollars in premature maintenance costs. Advanced MPUs stretch these replacement cycles to align with the natural lifecycle of the device itself, effectively eliminating unnecessary service dispatches.<\/p>\n

Where procurement teams see margin gains<\/h3>\n

Procurement teams that prioritize advanced power design see margin gains in two distinct areas. First, on the CAPEX side, a highly efficient processor often allows for a smaller solar panel, a cheaper power management IC (PMIC), and a lower-capacity battery, which lowers the overall BOM. Second, on the OPEX side, the extended lifespan allows companies to offer more competitive multi-year service contracts, increasing gross margins by drastically reducing the warranty and field service reserves they have to hold.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n

\n

What Advanced MPU Design Means for Remote IoT Devices<\/h2>\n

When I discuss \u201cadvanced\u201d design with engineering and sourcing teams, I am not just talking about raw clock speed or smaller semiconductor nodes, though those play a part. Advanced design in the context of remote IoT refers to the silicon\u2019s ability to ruthlessly manage its own energy consumption. It is about intelligence at the hardware level\u2014giving the processor the ability to segment its operations so that it only consumes power exactly when and where it is needed.<\/p>\n

This level of control is achieved through architectural innovations that treat power as a finite, precious resource. Designers implement complex matrices of power domains, allowing the chip to physically cut power to specific blocks of silicon (like a USB controller or a cryptographic engine) when they are not actively processing data. For B2B buyers, understanding these concepts is vital because it explains why two MPUs with the exact same clock speed can have drastically different real-world battery impacts.<\/p>\n

Furthermore, evaluating an ARM-based MPU<\/a> often reveals a multi-core strategy where a high-performance core handles heavy Linux workloads, while a low-power Cortex-M core handles simple sensor polling. This heterogeneous architecture is the hallmark of modern, advanced MPU design and is a primary driver of cost reduction in remote deployments.<\/p>\n

Key design elements: architecture, power domains, sleep states, and clocks<\/h3>\n

The foundation of a low-power MPU lies in its power domains and sleep states. Advanced chips are divided into isolated zones; if the network interface is idle, that specific domain is powered down without affecting the core processor. Additionally, granular sleep states (e.g., standby, deep sleep, and stop modes) allow the MPU to drop its current draw from milliamps down to microamps, while sophisticated clock gating ensures that no energy is wasted toggling transistors that aren\u2019t currently in use.<\/p>\n

How advanced MPUs differ from basic low-cost controllers<\/h3>\n

Basic microcontrollers (MCUs) are inherently low power, but they lack the processing power, memory management units (MMUs), and OS support (like embedded Linux) needed for complex edge analytics or secure network routing. Advanced MPUs bridge this gap. They provide the heavy computational lifting of a traditional microprocessor but borrow the aggressive power-saving techniques of an MCU, allowing remote devices to perform complex AI or data filtering at the edge without requiring a continuous grid connection.<\/p>\n

Specifications that affect power costs most<\/h3>\n

When reviewing datasheets, the specs that hit your wallet hardest are leakage current (the power drained simply by the chip being connected to a battery), wake-up time (how fast the chip transitions from deep sleep to active mode), and active power per megahertz (\u00b5A\/MHz). A chip that takes too long to wake up wastes precious energy just booting up, which destroys the power budget in applications that require frequent, brief bursts of activity.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n

\n

MPU Specifications That Reduce Power Consumption<\/h2>\n

Translating technical specifications into procurement strategies is where the magic happens. I always advise buyers to stop looking at the \u201cmaximum active power\u201d spec in isolation. In remote IoT, a device might spend 99% of its life asleep and only 1% active. Therefore, the way an MPU handles its dormant states and transitions is far more critical to your battery budget than its peak power consumption.<\/p>\n

To accurately forecast costs, you have to map the MPU\u2019s specifications against your device\u2019s specific duty cycle. A smart procurement strategy involves asking the engineering team for a power profile model. Once you have that, you can evaluate different MPU platforms based on how their hardware features\u2014like dynamic voltage scaling and hardware accelerators\u2014align with your specific use case.<\/p>\n

This alignment prevents a common sourcing mistake: paying a premium for an ultra-low-power MPU that lacks the hardware accelerators needed for your specific workload, forcing the main core to stay awake longer to process data, which ironically results in higher overall power consumption. You need the right Low-Power MPU<\/a> that balances sleep efficiency with processing speed.<\/p>\n

Evaluating power profiles under real duty cycles<\/h3>\n

A duty cycle represents the ratio of active time to sleep time. If your remote sensor wakes up once an hour, transmits a small packet of data, and goes back to sleep, the deep-sleep current is your most critical spec. Conversely, if the device wakes up to perform a complex 30-second machine learning inference before transmitting, the active processing efficiency (performance per watt) becomes the dominant factor in your power profile.<\/p>\n

Hardware features that matter: DVFS, low-power modes, and accelerators<\/h3>\n

Dynamic Voltage and Frequency Scaling (DVFS) allows the MPU to adjust its own voltage and clock speed on the fly based on the workload, saving massive amounts of energy. Furthermore, hardware accelerators (like dedicated cryptographic engines or DSPs) process specific tasks much faster and with less power than the main CPU core. Leveraging these features minimizes the time the device spends in its high-power active state.<\/p>\n

Comparing active power, sleep power, battery impact, and BOM tradeoffs<\/h3>\n

To illustrate the tradeoffs, consider this comparison between a standard and an advanced MPU architecture:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Caracter\u00edstica\/M\u00e9trica<\/th>\nStandard MPU<\/th>\nAdvanced Low-Power MPU<\/th>\nBOM Impact<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Deep Sleep Current<\/td>\n5.0 mA<\/td>\n0.5 mA<\/td>\nAllows use of smaller, cheaper battery cells.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Wake-up Time<\/td>\n50 ms<\/td>\n5 ms<\/td>\nReduces energy wasted during transition states.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
PMIC Requirement<\/td>\nComplex, multi-rail<\/td>\nIntegrated or simplified<\/td>\nLowers component count and PCB complexity.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Est. Battery Life (10Ah)<\/td>\n1.5 Years<\/td>\n4.5 Years<\/td>\nDrastically reduces field maintenance OPEX.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

How firmware optimization improves power efficiency<\/h3>\n

Hardware features are only as good as the software controlling them. I frequently remind buyers to factor in software development costs. If an MPU supplier provides a mature Software Development Kit (SDK) with pre-optimized power management libraries, your engineering team can easily implement deep sleep modes and DVFS. Poor firmware can keep a highly advanced MPU awake unnecessarily, completely negating the hardware\u2019s power-saving benefits.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n

\n

Sourcing, MOQ, and Total Landed Cost Considerations<\/h2>\n

Finding the perfect low-power MPU on a datasheet is only half the battle; procuring it efficiently is the other. In my experience, B2B buyers must look well beyond the unit price to understand the Total Landed Cost. This involves navigating Minimum Order Quantities (MOQs), negotiating lead times, and factoring in the logistics of how the chips are packaged and shipped.<\/p>\n

Furthermore, the semiconductor market is notoriously volatile. You are not just buying a batch of chips for today; you are marrying a supplier for the lifecycle of your IoT product. If the MPU you select goes end-of-life (EOL) in two years, the engineering costs to redesign the board and rewrite the firmware will wipe out any savings you achieved during the initial sourcing phase.<\/p>\n

Therefore, a robust sourcing strategy requires deep engagement with the manufacturer or franchised distributor. You need to secure commitments on lifecycle longevity, understand their supply chain resilience, and map out pricing tiers that align with your product\u2019s forecasted growth.<\/p>\n

Assessing supplier stability and lifecycle support<\/h3>\n

Remote IoT devices typically have deployment lifecycles of 5 to 10 years. Before approving an MPU, procurement must verify the manufacturer\u2019s longevity guarantee for that specific silicon family. I always ask for a formal Product Longevity Program (PLP) certificate, ensuring the supplier commits to manufacturing the chip for at least 10 years from its launch date, thereby protecting our NRE (Non-Recurring Engineering) investments.<\/p>\n

Questions on MOQ, lead times, packaging, and traceability<\/h3>\n

When negotiating, clarify the MOQ and the packaging formats (e.g., tape and reel vs. tray), as this impacts your contract manufacturer\u2019s automated assembly lines. Additionally, ask about standard lead times and cancellation windows. In critical infrastructure deployments, full lot traceability is non-negotiable; ensure the supplier provides detailed documentation so you can trace any field failures back to a specific silicon batch.<\/p>\n

How integration can reduce BOM and assembly complexity<\/h3>\n

Some advanced MPUs integrate external components, such as memory (SIP \u2013 System in Package) or power management units, directly into the chip. While the unit price of an integrated MPU might be higher, it eliminates several discrete components from your BOM, reduces the physical size of the PCB, and simplifies the SMT (Surface Mount Technology) assembly process, often resulting in a lower total landed cost.<\/p>\n

Price breaks, forecasting, and channel margin planning<\/h3>\n

To optimize channel margins, build a procurement model that leverages volume price breaks. Work with your distributors to set up scheduled blanket orders based on a rolling 12-month forecast. This guarantees your supply in a constrained market while allowing you to lock in high-volume pricing, which improves the gross margins for your downstream channel partners and managed service providers.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n

\n

Compliance, Reliability, and Deployment Factors<\/h2>\n

You cannot deploy a remote IoT device if it fails regional regulatory certifications or dies in harsh environmental conditions. Procurement teams must treat compliance and reliability as primary sourcing filters, not afterthoughts. If you select an MPU that generates excessive electromagnetic interference (EMI) or fails at extreme temperatures, your entire product launch will be delayed by costly board respins and re-certifications.<\/p>\n

I always cross-reference the MPU\u2019s environmental specifications with the physical realities of the deployment site. Remote IoT devices are routinely exposed to freezing winters, blistering summers, and high humidity. The silicon must be rated for industrial temperature ranges, and the manufacturer must provide robust reliability data, including Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) and thermal resistance metrics.<\/p>\n

Furthermore, as these devices connect to broader networks, their ability to interface reliably with existing infrastructure\u2014such as fiber optic terminals and network accessories\u2014is critical for seamless data transmission. Choosing a robust IoT Microprocessor<\/a> ensures your edge device can maintain stable, high-speed communication links without dropping packets or requiring constant reboots.<\/p>\n

Relevant certifications: RoHS, REACH, CE, FCC, and UL<\/h3>\n

Your MPU must strictly comply with material regulations like RoHS and REACH to be legally imported into regions like the European Union. Furthermore, the chip\u2019s design heavily influences the device\u2019s ability to pass CE, FCC (for electromagnetic emissions), and UL safety certifications. Sourcing components from reputable manufacturers ensures you have the necessary compliance declarations to satisfy customs and regulatory bodies.<\/p>\n

Thermal behavior, EMC performance, and long-term reliability<\/h3>\n

Advanced MPUs typically run cooler because they consume less power, which improves long-term reliability. However, you must still verify the industrial temperature rating (commonly -40\u00b0C to +85\u00b0C or higher). Additionally, review the manufacturer\u2019s Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) guidelines; a well-designed MPU will have features that minimize noise, making it easier and cheaper to pass emissions testing at the system level.<\/p>\n

Why secure MPU design matters for connected edge devices<\/h3>\n

In remote deployments, physical security is impossible. Therefore, the MPU must provide a hardware root of trust. Look for features like secure boot, cryptographic accelerators, and tamper-detection pins. If a remote device is compromised, it can be used as a backdoor into the enterprise network. Procurement must view these security features as mandatory risk-mitigation tools, not optional upgrades.<\/p>\n

Interoperability with network infrastructure and accessories<\/h3>\n

Remote IoT devices do not operate in a vacuum; they aggregate data and push it back through complex network topologies. The MPU must reliably support the necessary communication protocols (like Ethernet, CAN, or cellular modems) to interface smoothly with downstream infrastructure, including fiber optic network switches and connectivity accessories, ensuring fast, accurate, and maintenance-free data transfers.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n

\n

How Procurement Teams Should Compare MPU Platforms<\/h2>\n

Running a sourcing event for an advanced MPU requires a structured, multi-disciplinary approach. You cannot simply pull five datasheets, look at the price, and issue a purchase order. I recommend creating a weighted decision matrix that incorporates inputs from hardware engineering, software development, and field service teams.<\/p>\n

The goal is to evaluate the platform as a whole. Sometimes, a slightly more expensive MPU comes with an incredible software ecosystem that cuts your development time in half, saving hundreds of thousands of dollars in engineering payroll. Procurement\u2019s role is to facilitate this holistic evaluation, ensuring that every hidden cost\u2014from development tools to field maintenance\u2014is accounted for in the comparison.<\/p>\n

To do this effectively, you have to force suppliers to prove their claims. Do not rely solely on the marketing numbers on the first page of the datasheet. Require them to provide power consumption data based on your specific use case, and demand access to their support engineers during the evaluation phase to gauge how responsive they will be when your team runs into trouble.<\/p>\n

Define workload, power budget, battery model, and field conditions<\/h3>\n

Start by explicitly documenting your requirements. Define the exact computational workload, the strict maximum power budget, the physical size and chemistry of the battery you intend to use, and the environmental extremes the device will face. Use this document as the baseline standard; any MPU that cannot meet these criteria under simulated conditions should be immediately disqualified.<\/p>\n

Compare supplier support, SDK maturity, and firmware portability<\/h3>\n

An MPU is useless without good software. Evaluate the maturity of the supplier\u2019s Software Development Kit (SDK) and the availability of open-source community support (like Yocto Linux or Zephyr RTOS integration). High-quality, well-documented SDKs reduce time-to-market. Additionally, assess firmware portability; choosing an architecture that allows you to port code easily protects you if you need to switch suppliers in the future.<\/p>\n

Use sample orders, qualification runs, and pilot deployments<\/h3>\n

Never commit to mass production without rigorous real-world testing. Negotiate for engineering samples and evaluation boards early in the process. Run a small pilot deployment (e.g., 50 to 100 units) to monitor actual battery drain and thermal performance in the field. This qualification run is your last line of defense against unforeseen hardware bugs or power spikes before scaling up.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n

\n

Common MPU Sourcing Questions from B2B Buyers<\/h2>\n

In my consulting work with B2B supply chains, procurement managers repeatedly ask the same set of questions when transitioning to advanced MPU architectures. The underlying theme is always risk management: how do we balance the upfront costs of new technology against the promised long-term savings?<\/p>\n

Navigating these questions requires a solid understanding of both the semiconductor market and the specific mechanics of IoT deployments. Buyers are under immense pressure to reduce the BOM, but they must be educated on why squeezing the hardware budget too tightly can lead to catastrophic operational failures down the line.<\/p>\n

Here are the most frequent questions I field, along with the strategic answers that help procurement teams justify their sourcing decisions to the executive board.<\/p>\n

How much can advanced MPU design reduce power costs?<\/h3>\n

Depending on the baseline, the savings can be massive. By utilizing deep sleep modes and DVFS, an advanced MPU can reduce a device\u2019s average power consumption by 50% to 80% compared to an older, always-on processor. In terms of OPEX, this can extend battery life from 18 months to over 5 years, completely eliminating two or three expensive field service replacement cycles per device.<\/p>\n

Should buyers prioritize unit price or lifecycle cost?<\/h3>\n

Priorice siempre el costo del ciclo de vida (coste total de propiedad). Ahorrar $2 en el precio unitario de una MPU es una compensaci\u00f3n terrible si requiere una bater\u00eda $10 m\u00e1s grande o provoca que un cami\u00f3n $200 llegue dos a\u00f1os antes. Los compradores B2B deben crear modelos de costos que calculen el gasto total del dispositivo (incluyendo la lista de materiales, el desarrollo, el cumplimiento y el mantenimiento de campo) durante toda su vida \u00fatil implementada.<\/p>\n

\u00bfQu\u00e9 t\u00e9rminos de MOQ, embalaje y log\u00edstica se deben negociar?<\/h3>\n

Negocie MOQ que se alineen con su aumento realista de la producci\u00f3n, solicitando cronogramas de entrega escalonados para administrar el flujo de caja. Aseg\u00farese de que el embalaje (cinta y carrete) coincida con los requisitos de su ensamblador para evitar cargos por reembalaje. Lo m\u00e1s importante es negociar t\u00e9rminos estrictos con respecto a las garant\u00edas de plazos de entrega y los acuerdos de existencias de reserva (por ejemplo, inventario administrado por el proveedor) para proteger sus l\u00edneas de producci\u00f3n de una escasez repentina de semiconductores.<\/p>\n

\u00bfC\u00f3mo deber\u00edan los compradores calificar a un proveedor de MPU?<\/h3>\n

Calificar a los proveedores auditando su estabilidad financiera, capacidad de fabricaci\u00f3n y redundancias en la cadena de suministro (por ejemplo, \u00bfutilizan varias fundiciones?). Revise sus programas de longevidad de productos para garantizar un soporte a largo plazo. Adem\u00e1s, evaluar su infraestructura de soporte t\u00e9cnico; un proveedor debe tener ingenieros de aplicaciones de campo (FAE) accesibles en su regi\u00f3n para ayudar a su equipo de dise\u00f1o cuando surjan problemas de integraci\u00f3n.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n

\n

Conclusiones clave para elegir una MPU de bajo consumo<\/h2>\n

\"Conclusiones<\/p>\n

Elegir el silicio adecuado es una decisi\u00f3n estrat\u00e9gica que repercute en todo su modelo de negocio. La transici\u00f3n a arquitecturas avanzadas y de bajo consumo no es s\u00f3lo una actualizaci\u00f3n de ingenier\u00eda; es una estrategia de adquisiciones que impacta directamente la viabilidad del producto, los m\u00e1rgenes de servicio y la satisfacci\u00f3n del cliente.<\/p>\n

Al dar un paso atr\u00e1s y observar todo el ecosistema, desde la celda de la bater\u00eda hasta la red en la nube, se pueden tomar decisiones de abastecimiento que creen ventajas competitivas genuinas. Recuerda que el objetivo no es comprar el chip m\u00e1s barato, sino comprar el m\u00e1s eficiente MPU que funciona con bater\u00edas<\/a> que se adapta perfectamente a sus realidades de implementaci\u00f3n.<\/p>\n

Tenga en cuenta estos principios finales al estructurar su pr\u00f3ximo evento de abastecimiento y estar\u00e1 bien posicionado para entregar hardware financieramente s\u00f3lido y t\u00e9cnicamente s\u00f3lido.<\/p>\n

Haga coincidir la arquitectura MPU con el ciclo de trabajo, el entorno y el modelo de servicio<\/h3>\n

Aseg\u00farese de que las fortalezas del silicio se alineen directamente con la forma en que se utilizar\u00e1 el dispositivo. Haga coincidir la eficiencia del sue\u00f1o profundo con los dispositivos que rara vez se activan y combine la eficiencia del procesamiento con los dispositivos que manejan an\u00e1lisis de vanguardia intensivos. Tenga siempre en cuenta la dureza del entorno de implementaci\u00f3n y las realidades de sus contratos de mantenimiento de campo.<\/p>\n

Priorizar el costo total de propiedad sobre el precio de compra m\u00e1s bajo<\/h3>\n

Aleje la conversaci\u00f3n sobre adquisiciones de los costos de componentes aislados. Cree modelos integrales de TCO que demuestren a las partes interesadas c\u00f3mo invertir un poco m\u00e1s en una MPU avanzada y energ\u00e9ticamente eficiente reduce significativamente los costos de la bater\u00eda, reduce la huella de PCB y reduce dr\u00e1sticamente los gastos operativos y de mantenimiento a largo plazo.<\/p>\n

Cree programas de abastecimiento escalables para implementaciones remotas de IoT<\/h3>\n

Cree cadenas de suministro resilientes asoci\u00e1ndose con proveedores estables que ofrezcan ciclos de vida garantizados y soporte t\u00e9cnico s\u00f3lido. Implemente previsiones continuas, negocie condiciones favorables de log\u00edstica y embalaje y valide siempre el rendimiento mediante implementaciones piloto antes de comprometerse con la producci\u00f3n en masa. La escalabilidad requiere previsibilidad tanto en los precios como en el rendimiento.<\/p>\n

Lectura relacionada: Low-Power MPU<\/a><\/p>\n<\/section>\n

\n

Key Takeaways<\/h2>\n
    \n
  • Implicaciones del abastecimiento mayorista y de la cadena de suministro para MPU<\/li>\n
  • Especificaciones, cumplimiento y t\u00e9rminos comerciales que los compradores deben validar<\/li>\n
  • Recomendaciones pr\u00e1cticas para distribuidores y equipos de adquisiciones<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/section>\n<\/article>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Vea c\u00f3mo eval\u00fao el dise\u00f1o avanzado de MPU para reducir los costos de energ\u00eda remota de IoT, mejorar los m\u00e1rgenes de abastecimiento y respaldar programas de distribuidores escalables.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4651,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[114],"tags":[116],"class_list":["post-4652","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-mpu"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsunn.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4652","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsunn.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsunn.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsunn.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsunn.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4652"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsunn.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4652\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsunn.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4651"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsunn.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4652"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsunn.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4652"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsunn.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4652"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}